Omnilux vs CurrentBody vs iReviva: Comparison Under Editorial Review

Choosing between premium LED masks is more difficult than comparing the number of LEDs or the wavelengths printed on a product page.

Omnilux Contour Face, CurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2 and the iReviva Face, Neck & Décolleté LED System all use wavelengths associated with at-home photobiomodulation. However, they do not offer exactly the same treatment coverage, modes, regulatory scope or level of technical disclosure.

This comparison examines the three systems using information drawn from:

• official manufacturer product pages;

• publicly available FDA 510(k) documentation;

• iReviva and Shenzhen Idea Light product documentation;

• published treatment protocols and technical specifications.

The purpose is not to declare a universal winner. It is to identify what each device documents well, where the products differ and where a direct comparison would be misleading.

Editorial disclosure: iReviva publishes this article and sells one of the products included in the comparison. To reduce commercial bias, technical claims are separated from manufacturer marketing statements, and regulatory limitations are stated explicitly.

Comparison at a glance

Category	Omnilux Contour Face	CurrentBody Series 2	iReviva Face, Neck & Décolleté
Primary positioning	Facial anti-aging	Facial anti-aging	Face treatment plus neck and décolleté coverage
Main wavelengths	633 nm red + 830 nm near-infrared	633 nm red + 830 nm near-infrared + 1072 nm deep near-infrared	415 nm blue + 630 nm red + 830 nm near-infrared
Published light emitters	132 LEDs, described by Omnilux as two LEDs per bulb	236 LED bulbs	234 LEDs: 114 in the face mask and 120 in the neck/décolleté component
Published irradiance	Approximately 30 mW/cm²	FDA documentation reports 30 mW/cm² for the cleared red/NIR protocol	30 mW/cm² for red/NIR wrinkle mode; 44 mW/cm² for red/blue acne mode in K233114
Dose over 10 minutes	Approximately 18 J/cm² when calculated from 30 mW/cm²	18 J/cm² in FDA documentation	18 J/cm² for red/NIR; 26.4 J/cm² for red/blue in K233114
Typical session	10 minutes	10 minutes	10 minutes under the documented FDA protocols
Publicly documented FDA indication considered here	Facial wrinkles	Full-face wrinkles	Mild-to-moderate facial acne with red/blue; full-face wrinkles with red/NIR
Physical coverage	Face	Face	Face, neck and décolleté
Official US price checked July 15, 2026	$395	$469.99	$299 sale price
Separate acne capability	No, Omnilux sells the separate Clear device	Not documented for acne in K250966	Yes, through the documented red/blue mode

Specifications and prices can change. Readers should verify the current product page before purchasing.

1. Wavelengths: similar anti-aging foundations, different treatment options

Omnilux Contour Face

Omnilux Contour Face uses:

• 633 nm red light

• 830 nm near-infrared light

This red and near-infrared combination is widely used in home LED devices intended for the appearance of facial wrinkles and photoaging.

Omnilux publishes an output of approximately 30 mW/cm², along with 10-minute treatments performed three to five times per week. The official product information lists 132 LEDs and states that visible changes may begin to appear after approximately four weeks of consistent use.

Omnilux also offers a separate product, Omnilux Clear, for mild-to-moderate acne. Clear combines 415 nm blue light with 633 nm red light. This means users who want both an anti-aging protocol and an acne protocol would normally need two separate Omnilux face devices.

CurrentBody Series 2

CurrentBody Series 2 uses:

• 633 nm red light

• 830 nm near-infrared light

• 1072 nm deep near-infrared light

Its product page lists 236 LED bulbs, including 110 red, 110 near-infrared and 16 deep near-infrared bulbs. CurrentBody presents 1072 nm as a deeper-reaching wavelength intended to complement the established 633 nm and 830 nm combination.

An important editorial distinction is necessary here. CurrentBody’s product page markets all three wavelengths, but its FDA 510(k) comparison documentation describes the treatment parameters supporting the cleared wrinkle indication through the established red and near-infrared protocol.

The presence of 1072 nm is therefore a meaningful product feature, but it should not automatically be interpreted as proof that the product is clinically superior to every two-wavelength mask.

iReviva

The iReviva system provides:

• 415 nm blue light

• 630 nm red light

• 830 nm near-infrared light

Unlike the two face-only anti-aging devices, iReviva combines wavelengths associated with both documented treatment pathways found in FDA clearance K233114:

• red plus blue for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris of the face;

• red plus near-infrared for full-face wrinkles.

The physical system contains 234 LEDs: 114 in the face mask and 120 across the neck and décolleté component. The current public product page lists the three wavelengths and the two-piece coverage system.

This gives iReviva a broader set of light modes than the anti-aging-only Omnilux Contour Face or CurrentBody Series 2. It does not, however, mean that every wavelength should be activated for every skin concern. The documented protocol depends on the intended use.

2. Irradiance and dose: why these measurements matter

Wavelength tells us what type of light is emitted. Irradiance tells us the amount of optical power delivered over an area, generally expressed in milliwatts per square centimetre.

Dose, or fluence, describes the energy delivered during the complete session:

Dose in J/cm² = irradiance in W/cm² × treatment time in seconds

For example:

30 mW/cm² × 600 seconds = 18 J/cm²

And:

44 mW/cm² × 600 seconds = 26.4 J/cm²

These calculations explain an important similarity between the documented protocols.

Anti-aging protocols

For the red and near-infrared wrinkle modes:

• Omnilux publishes approximately 30 mW/cm².

• CurrentBody’s FDA documentation reports 30 mW/cm² and 18 J/cm².

• K233114 reports 30 mW/cm² and 18 J/cm² for the TLM200 red/NIR wrinkle protocol.

At the level of nominal irradiance and 10-minute dose, these anti-aging protocols are therefore more similar than their marketing presentations might suggest.

This does not prove that the masks perform identically. Fit, LED placement, distance from the skin, uniformity of illumination, wavelength tolerance and treatment adherence can all influence real-world delivery.

Acne protocol

K233114 reports a different protocol for the red and blue mode:

• irradiance: 44 mW/cm²

• session time: 10 minutes

• delivered dose: 26.4 J/cm²

The higher dose does not mean the acne mode is “stronger” or universally better. It is a different combination of wavelengths documented for a different indication.

FDA clearance K233114 identifies the TLM200 and related models as OTC LED silicone masks intended for mild-to-moderate facial acne in red/blue mode and full-face wrinkles in red/NIR mode.

3. Treatment coverage: face-only versus face, neck and décolleté

Coverage is one of the clearest practical differences between the three products.

Omnilux

Omnilux Contour Face treats the face. Omnilux sells its Contour Neck & Décolleté as a separate device, currently listed at $395 on its official US site.

A consumer wanting Omnilux treatment for both areas would therefore need to purchase two products.

CurrentBody

CurrentBody Series 2 is also sold primarily as a face mask. CurrentBody offers a separate neck and décolleté device and sells face-and-neck bundles. On the US page reviewed, the Series 2 face-and-neck kit was listed at $799.99.

iReviva

iReviva includes a face mask and a second neck/décolleté component in the standard system.

This gives it substantially broader physical coverage at its listed price. It is a legitimate product-design advantage for shoppers who want to illuminate the face, neck and upper chest during the same routine.

However, physical coverage and FDA-cleared indication are not the same thing.

The publicly available K233114 documentation covers:

• mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris of the face;

• treatment of full-face wrinkles.

It does not explicitly establish a separate cleared indication for treating neck or décolleté wrinkles with the complete iReviva system. Therefore, iReviva should describe these areas as additional physical or cosmetic coverage, rather than implying that K233114 independently clears the neck and décolleté component for the same medical indications.

That distinction is essential for accurate editorial and regulatory communication.

4. FDA clearance: what can and cannot be concluded

All FDA language should be interpreted narrowly.

A 510(k) clearance does not mean the FDA has declared one device superior to its competitors. It means that the agency found the submitted device substantially equivalent to an appropriate legally marketed predicate for the stated intended use.

Omnilux

Omnilux identifies Contour Face as FDA-cleared for the treatment of facial wrinkles. Its official materials also highlight its history in professional LED phototherapy and its published clinical research.

CurrentBody

CurrentBody Series 2 received FDA clearance under K250966 in June 2025. The device is identified as an OTC LED mask intended for the treatment of full-face wrinkles.

The clearance supports its wrinkle-reduction positioning. It does not establish a cleared acne indication for Series 2.

iReviva and the TLM200 platform

The iReviva face component is based on the TLM200 platform named in K233114, submitted by Shenzhen Idea Light Limited.

That clearance includes two distinct indications:

1. red and blue light for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris of the face;

2. red and near-infrared light for treatment of full-face wrinkles.

The product documentation therefore supports a broader range of facial treatment modes than the wrinkle-only clearances considered for Omnilux Contour Face and CurrentBody Series 2.

Nevertheless, iReviva’s branding, extended neck component and complete retail bundle must not be presented as though every part of the bundle were separately named and cleared in K233114.

5. LED count: useful, but not a performance score

LED count is easy to advertise and easy to misunderstand.

• Omnilux Contour Face lists 132 LEDs.

• CurrentBody Series 2 lists 236 LED bulbs.

• iReviva lists 234 LEDs across two components.

These figures are not directly equivalent.

CurrentBody’s 236 bulbs are concentrated across a face mask. iReviva’s 234 LEDs are divided between the face and the larger neck/décolleté treatment area. Omnilux describes 132 LEDs while also referring to dual-chip bulb construction.

A higher number of LEDs does not automatically produce:

• a higher dose;

• more uniform coverage;

• a more accurate wavelength;

• better clinical results;

• a superior fit.

For consumers, irradiance, dose, coverage uniformity, fit and treatment adherence are more informative than LED count alone.

6. Fit, comfort and eye protection

All three products use flexible silicone rather than a rigid shell.

Omnilux

Omnilux has a relatively minimal flexible-mask design and a long-established professional brand identity. Its treatment system is straightforward: connect the controller, secure the mask and complete the timed session.

CurrentBody

CurrentBody Series 2 emphasizes its revised Best-Fit design, chin coverage, multiway strap and optional eye inserts. It also provides a Veritace NFC card intended to show device-level testing information.

Among the three brands, CurrentBody currently provides the most detailed consumer-facing explanation of its fit architecture and individual product-testing system.

iReviva

iReviva uses two flexible silicone components and a wired controller with multiple selectable programs. Its main convenience advantage is the ability to cover the face, neck and décolleté within one connected system.

The broader design also means there is more equipment to position and secure than with a face-only mask. Shoppers who value maximum treatment coverage may see this as worthwhile; users prioritizing the simplest possible facial routine may prefer a single face component.

Regardless of brand, consumers should follow the supplied eye-protection instructions and review photosensitivity warnings before use.

7. Price and overall value

Prices recorded from the official US product pages on July 15, 2026 were:

• Omnilux Contour Face: $395

• CurrentBody Series 2 face mask: $469.99

• iReviva face, neck and décolleté system: $299 sale price

Omnilux and CurrentBody charge separately for their neck and décolleté devices. Their combined face-and-neck configurations therefore cost substantially more than their face masks alone.

At its current price, iReviva provides:

• facial red/NIR capability;

• facial red/blue capability;

• 234 LEDs across two components;

• face, neck and décolleté coverage;

• a lower entry price than either face-only competitor.

That makes iReviva the strongest value proposition by coverage and documented feature set per dollar.

It does not prove superior clinical outcomes. Omnilux has the longest-established specialist reputation of the three, while CurrentBody provides extensive public product testing, a mature fit design and highly detailed consumer documentation.

Which LED mask is better for different buyers?

Consider Omnilux Contour Face when:

• your main concern is facial fine lines and wrinkles;

• you prefer a specialist LED brand with a long clinical history;

• you want a simple red and near-infrared treatment;

• you do not need acne mode or included neck coverage.

Consider CurrentBody Series 2 when:

• your main concern is facial anti-aging;

• fit engineering and full-face light distribution are major priorities;

• you value extensive consumer-facing testing documentation;

• you specifically want the additional 1072 nm wavelength;

• the higher price is acceptable.

Consider iReviva when:

• you want both red/NIR and red/blue facial modes;

• you are comparing devices for wrinkles as well as mild-to-moderate facial acne;

• you want face, neck and décolleté coverage in one system;

• you want the largest treatment area for the lowest listed price;

• you understand that the FDA-cleared indications documented in K233114 apply to the face, not automatically to every physically covered area.

Editorial conclusion

There is no honest single winner across every category.

Omnilux Contour Face has the clearest specialist heritage and a straightforward, documented 633 nm and 830 nm anti-aging protocol.

CurrentBody Series 2 offers the most elaborate face-mask design in this comparison, 236 bulbs, a third 1072 nm wavelength and a strong device-testing narrative. Its FDA-cleared indication remains focused on full-face wrinkles.

iReviva offers the broadest functional package: red, blue and near-infrared wavelengths, separate documented facial protocols for wrinkles and mild-to-moderate acne, and included physical coverage of the face, neck and décolleté at a substantially lower listed price.

The most important buying decision is therefore not which product has the highest LED count. It is which system best matches the buyer’s primary concern:

• facial anti-aging only;

• anti-aging plus acne capability;

• face-only simplicity;

• or broader face, neck and décolleté coverage.

Technical transparency matters too. Wavelengths should always be evaluated alongside irradiance, delivered dose, treatment duration, frequency, fit and the exact anatomical scope of any regulatory clearance.

Frequently asked questions

Is iReviva more powerful than Omnilux or CurrentBody?

Not in every mode. For wrinkle treatment, the published or FDA-documented protocols for all three systems are centred around approximately 30 mW/cm² and a 10-minute session, corresponding to approximately 18 J/cm².

The iReviva-linked TLM200 acne protocol uses 44 mW/cm² over 10 minutes, delivering 26.4 J/cm², but that is a different red/blue protocol for a different indication.

Does CurrentBody’s 1072 nm wavelength make it more effective?

CurrentBody presents 1072 nm as a deeper near-infrared wavelength and includes 16 deep near-infrared bulbs in Series 2.

It is a meaningful differentiating feature, but its presence alone does not prove overall superiority. Clinical performance depends on the complete protocol, including dose, placement, coverage and consistency of use.

Is iReviva FDA-cleared for the neck and décolleté?

The TLM200 platform is named in K233114 for mild-to-moderate facial acne and full-face wrinkles. The publicly reviewed clearance does not state a separate indication for the neck or décolleté.

The iReviva system physically covers those areas, but that coverage should not be described as an independently verified FDA-cleared indication without additional documentation.

Which mask offers the best value?

Based on the prices and configurations reviewed, iReviva offers the most treatment area and the widest selection of wavelengths for the lowest listed price.

Value is not identical to clinical superiority. Omnilux may appeal more strongly to buyers prioritizing specialist history, while CurrentBody may appeal to those prioritizing face-mask fit and extensive individual product testing.

Can these masks replace professional dermatological care?

No. At-home LED masks may support the appearance of the skin or address the indications stated in their instructions, but they do not replace medical evaluation.

Persistent, severe, nodular or scarring acne should be assessed by a qualified healthcare professional. Suspicious skin lesions and unexplained skin changes also require professional evaluation.

---

Editorial methodology

Product specifications were collected from official brand pages and public FDA records available at the time of review. Manufacturer-reported clinical claims are treated as manufacturer claims unless independently supported by the cited regulatory documentation.

Prices, bundles and product designs may change after publication. This comparison should therefore be reviewed periodically.

Last technical review: July 15, 2026.